[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#704524: unblock: nbd/1:3.2-4



Control: tag -1 + d-i

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 08:24:00PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> On 02-04-13 15:08, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Hi Steven,
> > 
> > On 02-04-13 14:51, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> >> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> >>
> >> Hi Wouter,
> >>
> >> You had a FTBFS on mips which would need to be fixed in any case.
> >>
> >>> E: listing not allowed by server.
> >>> FAIL: list
> >> That sounds like it might be related to this change you mentioned?  But
> >> seems odd it would only occur on one architecture:
> > It's not the only failure in the test suite; looking at the tests that
> > failed, my guess is that there is another nbd-server running on the
> > buildd in question.
> > 
> > Mips buildd admins: can you please verify if that is the case? If so
> > (and it's not genuinely installed), please kill it and reschedule the
> > build, it should work then.
> > 
> > (I discovered a while back that the nbd-server test suite did not
> > properly kill the running server, which opens port 10809 by default. I
> > thought I fixed that, but I might be mistaken...)
> 
> It built now, but the package still hasn't been unblocked. Can I please
> get a reply now either way about whether this unblock is going to happen?

I'm afraid at this stage it's pretty unlikely. You will also need an ack
from d-i, and whilst I don't speak for KiBi I think that even more
unlikely.

Closing for now so it gets off the list; if you wish to reopen with further
discussion please feel free.

Thanks,


-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
            8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
			layered on top of bonghits

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: