[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#702458: marked as done (unblock: xen-api/1.3.2-14 (pre-approval))



Your message dated Sat, 13 Apr 2013 16:39:06 +0100
with message-id <1365867546.4627.52.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#702458: unblock: xcp-xapi - urgent documentation fixes
has caused the Debian Bug report #702458,
regarding unblock: xen-api/1.3.2-14 (pre-approval)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
702458: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702458
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal

The current README.Debian is quite old

It gives some advice that will lead to people having a broken system
(e.g. no networking).  It describes a procedure for configuring
networking that is completely opposite to what has been described more
recently on the upstream mailing list

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702337

I'm happy to overhaul this document and submit a debdiff for the release
team to review - please confirm if this work should go ahead.  No other
files in the package will be changed.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 21:23 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> The current README.Debian is quite old
> 
> It gives some advice that will lead to people having a broken system
> (e.g. no networking).  It describes a procedure for configuring
> networking that is completely opposite to what has been described more
> recently on the upstream mailing list

It looks like this became #704148, so I'm closing this earlier request.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---

Reply to: