On 04/06/2013 12:53 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
If there are other reasons to migrate the package, potentially, but...
Well, there aren't.
Which versions of the package FTBFS on s390x? There are setools binary packages in testing on that architecture, so it obviously built at some point; what changed?Interesting. I am pretty sure there was an FTBFS on s390x, I'll have to check my mail from that time. Nick, do you remember why you fixed the symbol table for s390x?In a later mail he said the s390x problem was introduced in -3.1 when the arm/m68k symbols files were added. If that's the case then as wheezy only has -3 it isn't affected.
Ah, right, now I remember. He fixed the symbol tables for m68k which triggered the problems on s390x, then he fixed s390x and ppc64 such that the package builds fine on all architectures.
Anyway, you're right Adam, there isn't really a reason to unblock this. Please go ahead and close this unblock request.
Cheers, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913