Bug#699210: unblock: setools/3.3.7-3.3
On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 12:48 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 04/04/2013 10:10 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > None of arm, m68k or ppc64 are in Debian right now, so the package's
> > buildability on them doesn't seem particularly relevant.
>
> True! But the additional symbol tables for these architectures shouldn't
> hurt the other architectures as well. The diff is naturally large as it
> contains the additional symbol tables.
If there are other reasons to migrate the package, potentially, but...
> > Which versions of the package FTBFS on s390x? There are setools binary
> > packages in testing on that architecture, so it obviously built at some
> > point; what changed?
>
> Interesting. I am pretty sure there was an FTBFS on s390x, I'll have to
> check my mail from that time.
>
> Nick, do you remember why you fixed the symbol table for s390x?
In a later mail he said the s390x problem was introduced in -3.1 when
the arm/m68k symbols files were added. If that's the case then as wheezy
only has -3 it isn't affected.
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: