Re: e2fsprogs_1.42.5-1.1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>]

On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:34:31AM +0000, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> 
> I'm not sure if the installer team would want to reroll the images or
> not, since there is no code changes to the udebs.
> But the fix will benefit to be present in the CD's pool to anyone who
> upgrades from CDs without internet access.

I agree that there would be no code changes to the udebs (since the
udebs wouldn't have the pre-install scripts nor changelogs) --- but
they would be out of sync as far as the version numbers are concerned.
Does that matter?  I dunno; it's might be a policy/process violation,
but not a practical one.

I'll let affected teams decide.

						- Ted