On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:06:05 +0000, Toby Smithe wrote: > On 6 March 2013 05:46, Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote: > > In general, sure, improved architecture support is great. During a > > freeze however it's often more of a "feature" and generally won't be as > > well tested as previously supported architectures. > > Well, I could always drop the patch, but that does seem bizarre (ie, > actively to keep something broken because having no features is better > than having most/all of the features but in a relatively untested > state). It's only musescore! > As a matter of fact, it is better. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature