[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: New version of musescore package



On 6 March 2013 05:46, Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote:
> In general, sure, improved architecture support is great. During a
> freeze however it's often more of a "feature" and generally won't be as
> well tested as previously supported architectures.

Well, I could always drop the patch, but that does seem bizarre (ie,
actively to keep something broken because having no features is better
than having most/all of the features but in a relatively untested
state). It's only musescore!

> fwiw I can't find said earlier message either in my mail or the -release
> web archive. Note that if the diff were more than a few 100kb in size
> it's entirely possible that the list server silently dropped it. In that
> case please consider producing a filtered debdiff, excluding e.g.
> translations, but clearly indicating how it was filtered.

Ah, that must be it. In fact, I did previously send both a larger
gzipped debdiff containing all the changes, which was about 400kb, and
a filtered debdiff containing no translations (which was about 180kb
without compression). I have attached again the filtered diff, which
was produced using the following command

filterdiff -x "*translations*" -x "*MuseScore*html" -x "*locale*"
1.3.debdiff > 1.3-tr1.diff

where 1.3.debdiff is the debdiff between the current 1.2+dfsg-1
package, and the updated 1.3+dfsg-1 version.

Best,

Toby

Attachment: 1.3-tr1.diff
Description: Binary data


Reply to: