[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#685110: marked as done (tpu: dhelp/0.6.20+nmu1)

Your message dated Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:43:19 +0000
with message-id <20130219204319.GK10234@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#685110: unblock: dhelp/0.6.21+nmu1
has caused the Debian Bug report #685110,
regarding tpu: dhelp/0.6.20+nmu1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
685110: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685110
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package dhelp

Quoting from the mail I sent to debian-release@l.d.o
(20120724204905.GB20182@gwolf.org):

> With the freeze already in place, I uploaded 0.6.21+nmu1 to the
> delayed queue. I now see that 0.6.21 never entered testing (as it is
> not installable), but does have several nontrivial changes (at least
> some bugfixes):
>
> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/d/dhelp/current/changelog
>
> I hope it is still acceptable to let 0.6.21+nmu1 in testing, as
> otherwise quite a bit of work by Georgios would be wasted for this
> release cycle. Please comment if you don't agree with this!

Thanks,

unblock dhelp/0.6.21+nmu1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 07:45:02PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:25:45 +0000, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> 
> > > > Is there any chance of an isolated fix to the RC bug #699261, through tpu
> > > > if necessary?
> > > There's already a patch for 0.6.20 / TPU in #699261 :)
> > Ah, so there is. Feel free to go ahead with the tpu upload based on
> > 699261_wheezy.diff.
> 
> Thank you!
> Uploaded.

Flagged for acceptance, thanks for the quick turn-around.

-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
            8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
			layered on top of bonghits

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: