Control: severity -1 important Hi, Am Dienstag, den 29.01.2013, 17:03 +0000 schrieb Steve McIntyre: > On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 07:11:57PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: > >Am Sonntag, den 27.01.2013, 15:09 +0000 schrieb Steve McIntyre: > >> Do we have any hope of progress on this RC bug? Otherwise it's > >> incredibly tempting to push for removal of libghc-warp-dev considering > >> its tiny popcon and the fact that it has never been in a stable Debian > >> release... > > > >I’m still have doubts if the severity is appropriate. The proportion of > >clients sending such strange header is likely quite small, so this > >sounds more like “a bug which has a major effect on the usability of a > >package, without rendering it completely unusable to everyone.” i.e. > >important. > > In that case, drop the severity? I'm curious why you didn't do that > already, in fact. I guess due to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691600#19 and me waiting for a second opinion. But doing it now. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part