Hi, Am Sonntag, den 27.01.2013, 15:09 +0000 schrieb Steve McIntyre: > Do we have any hope of progress on this RC bug? Otherwise it's > incredibly tempting to push for removal of libghc-warp-dev considering > its tiny popcon and the fact that it has never been in a stable Debian > release... I’m still have doubts if the severity is appropriate. The proportion of clients sending such strange header is likely quite small, so this sounds more like “a bug which has a major effect on the usability of a package, without rendering it completely unusable to everyone.” i.e. important. Or does anyone think that not having warp (and its reverse dependencies) in is better than a version with incompatibility problems? Thanks, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part