On Sun, 06 May 2012 22:13:05 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > (No error handling when doing I/O? Bad. But oh well, using tempfile > > makes it look better anyway.) > Specifically, a loss of error handling. The original version at least > let the caller gracefully handle the failure, whereas the new version is > technically an API change in that the function is defined as returning > undef in the case of failure and no longer does if creating the > temporary file fails; I'm not sure how well the (several) r-deps in the > archive will handle that. Hm, good catch. (tempfile() indeed just croak()s on errors according to the documentation). Maybe it's better to give this a second look ... Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Paco de Lucia: Manteca Colora [Rumba]
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature