[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#573187: transition: mpi-defaults



On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:18:06 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:

> The new mpi-defaults was uploaded to sid in December, here's the current
> state.
> 
> Reverse-dependencies of lam left in testing:
> - apbs; binNMUs scheduled

mips failed, the rest are ok.

> - cctools; fixed in unstable, but FTBFS (#661658)
> - clustalw-mpi; needs a bug filed

Filed, and closed.  But will need builds on a bunch of archs.

> - fftw; binNMUs scheduled

All built, looks like mips/mipsel had expired keys so will need a
reupload once that's sorted.

> - gerris; FTBFS (#652258)
> - ghemical; binNMUs scheduled

Failed (because mpqc was still built against lam, I think).  Should be
given back I guess.

> - hdf5; needs #631019 sorted so libhdf5-lam-1.8.4 can be removed
> - hpcc; binNMUs scheduled

Will need a reupload on mips once keys are sorted.

> - libghemical; binNMUs scheduled

Failed because of #661674 I think.

> - libgpiv; FTBFS (#657199)
> - mpqc; FTBFS on mips, given back for now
> - mrbayes; unbuildable on kfreebsd (#661659, #661663)
> - mumps; in the middle of a SONAME bump (#650642, #659898, #651452,
>   something else with getdp, petsc/slepc's own bumps
> - netpipe; #571449
> - parmetis; binNMUs scheduled
> - regina-normal; binNMUs scheduled

Looks ok so far.

> - rmpi; binNMUs scheduled

FTBFS, needs a bug filed.

> - starpu; binNMUs scheduled

Looks ok modulo buildd key issues.

> - tessa; fixed in sid

Needs a fixed pytables before it can migrate.

> - xmpi; #571448, should apparently be removed
> 
> Reverse-dependencies of mpich left in testing:
> - meep; #661661
> - netpipe; see above
> - xmds; fixed in sid
> 
xmds now fixed in wheezy as well.

Cheers,

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: