[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#687477: marked as done (unblock: poco/1.3.6p1-4)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Nov 2012 23:51:08 +0100
with message-id <20121112225108.GD17465@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#687477: unblock: poco/1.3.6p1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #687477,
regarding unblock: poco/1.3.6p1-4
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
687477: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687477
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Please unblock package poco

while poco seems to be removed from testing due to some longer standing
RC bugs there are packages (build-)depending from it remaining in
testing (example: sitplus, see #680798).  To close bug #680798
libpoco-dev needs to be provided in testing and thus I would like to
ask you to unblock poco.  All its RC bugs should be fixed regarding
to this mail:

-------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:24:52 +0200
From: Cristian Greco <cristian@debian.org>
To: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
Cc: 642733@bugs.debian.org, 680798@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Libpoco can not migrate to testing doe to remaining serious bug

On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:11:14 +0200
Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> wrote:

> Hi Cristian,
> 
> I have seen that you cherry picked from the experimental branch patches
> to close several bugs but I think due to bug #642733 the package can not
> yet go to testing and thus there is the danger that its reverse depends
> will be kicked as well.  Would you please consider fixing #642733 as
> well?

Hi Andreas,

this bug has been fixed in unstable with the upload of poco 1.3.6p1-2.
It is just a copy of #654238, but I didn't notice because it was already
marked as fixed by the upload of poco 1.4.2p1-1 in experimental.

Also, bug #680798 in sitplus is already fixed for me.

Please let me know if there is something more I can do to let poco and
its deps enter wheezy.

Thanks,
--
Cristian Greco
GPG key ID: 0xCF4D32E4
--------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for considering the unblock and all the work you are doing

       Andreas.


unblock poco/1.3.6p1-4

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.5
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.36-xenU-4814-i386 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 07:53:49 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:

> Please unblock package poco
> 
I'll probably regret this, but... unblocked poco and sitplus.  Mostly
because poco was in squeeze.  Your RC bug reponse could do with some
improvements...

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: