[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#687373: marked as done (pre-approve unblock: libxvmc/1.0.7-1.1)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Nov 2012 23:33:58 +0100
with message-id <20121112223358.GC17465@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#687373: pre-approve unblock: libxvmc/1.0.7-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #687373,
regarding pre-approve unblock: libxvmc/1.0.7-1.1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
687373: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687373
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Dear release managers,

please approve the upload of a NMU of libxvmc that converts the package
to multiarch for inclusion in wheezy, fixing #640499. Of course the
maintainers are welcome to do such an upload themselves.

The patch has been around for a year, has gotten more testing recently
and Ralf Jung has confirmed that it is OK to have shared conffiles in
M-A: same packages.

I consider adding multiarch support to libxvmc1 as important, as
this is currently a regression from squeeze: users of the non-free
Nvidia drivers on amd64 are unable to get OpenGL acceleration in 32-bit
applications. Most often this is observed in 32-bit wine, which seems to
be a frequent use case considering the number of bug reports and
commenters:
  #676723: libgl1-nvidia-glx:i386: Please downgrad libxvmc dependency to
  Recommends,
  #685054: breaks wine (32-bit) OpenGL support on amd64,
  #686033: libgl1-nvidia-glx: 304.37-1 libgl1-nvidia-glx:i386 removes
  libgl1-nvidia-glx (amd64) and Nvidia driver

Also, without libxvmc1:i386 we can't give working instructions for
replacing the obsolete *nvidia*-ia32 packages (which need to become
transitional due to the phasing out of the monolithic ia32-libs) by
their multiarchified variants.

If I get an OK that a package with the attached nmudiff 
  5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
is fine for wheezy, I'll go looking for a sponsor (unless the
maintainers object).


Andreas

unblock libxvmc/1.0.7-1.1

diffstat for libxvmc_1.0.7-1 libxvmc_1.0.7-1.1

 changelog           |    7 +++++++
 control             |    3 +++
 libxvmc-dev.install |   10 +++++-----
 libxvmc1.install    |    4 ++--
 rules               |    3 +++
 5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff -u libxvmc-1.0.7/debian/rules libxvmc-1.0.7/debian/rules
--- libxvmc-1.0.7/debian/rules
+++ libxvmc-1.0.7/debian/rules
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
 # set this to the name of the main shlib's binary package
 PACKAGE = libxvmc1
 
+DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)
+
 include debian/xsfbs/xsfbs.mk
 
 CFLAGS = -Wall -g
@@ -40,6 +42,7 @@
 	mkdir -p build
 	cd build && \
 	../configure --prefix=/usr \
+	             --libdir=\$${prefix}/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH) \
 	             --sysconfdir=/etc --mandir=\$${prefix}/share/man \
 	             --infodir=\$${prefix}/share/info $(confflags) \
 	             CFLAGS="$(CFLAGS)" 
diff -u libxvmc-1.0.7/debian/control libxvmc-1.0.7/debian/control
--- libxvmc-1.0.7/debian/control
+++ libxvmc-1.0.7/debian/control
@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
 Package: libxvmc1
 Section: libs
 Architecture: any
+Multi-Arch: same
+Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}
 Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, x11-common
 Description: X11 Video extension library
  libXvMC provides an X Window System client interface to the
@@ -63,6 +65,7 @@
 Package: libxvmc-dev
 Section: libdevel
 Architecture: any
+Multi-Arch: same
 Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, libxvmc1 (= ${binary:Version}), libx11-dev (>= 2:1.0.0-1), libxext-dev (>= 1:1.0.0-2), x11proto-video-dev, libxv-dev
 Conflicts: x11proto-video-dev (<< 2.2+cvs.20050712-1)
 Replaces: x11proto-video-dev (<< 2.2+cvs.20050712-1)
diff -u libxvmc-1.0.7/debian/libxvmc-dev.install libxvmc-1.0.7/debian/libxvmc-dev.install
--- libxvmc-1.0.7/debian/libxvmc-dev.install
+++ libxvmc-1.0.7/debian/libxvmc-dev.install
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 usr/include/X11/*
-usr/lib/libXvMC.a
-usr/lib/libXvMC.so
-usr/lib/libXvMCW.a
-usr/lib/libXvMCW.so
-usr/lib/pkgconfig/xvmc.pc
+usr/lib/*/libXvMC.a
+usr/lib/*/libXvMC.so
+usr/lib/*/libXvMCW.a
+usr/lib/*/libXvMCW.so
+usr/lib/*/pkgconfig/xvmc.pc
 usr/share/doc/libXvMC/* usr/share/doc/libxvmc-dev
diff -u libxvmc-1.0.7/debian/libxvmc1.install libxvmc-1.0.7/debian/libxvmc1.install
--- libxvmc-1.0.7/debian/libxvmc1.install
+++ libxvmc-1.0.7/debian/libxvmc1.install
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
-usr/lib/libXvMC.so.1*
-usr/lib/libXvMCW.so.1*
+usr/lib/*/libXvMC.so.1*
+usr/lib/*/libXvMCW.so.1*
 etc/X11/XvMCConfig
diff -u libxvmc-1.0.7/debian/changelog libxvmc-1.0.7/debian/changelog
--- libxvmc-1.0.7/debian/changelog
+++ libxvmc-1.0.7/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+libxvmc (2:1.0.7-1.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Build for multiarch.  (Closes: #640499)
+
+ -- Andreas Beckmann <debian@abeckmann.de>  Wed, 12 Sep 2012 05:16:31 +0200
+
 libxvmc (2:1.0.7-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   [ Robert Hooker ]

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:36:20 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> 
> Dear release managers,
> 
> please approve the upload of a NMU of libxvmc that converts the package
> to multiarch for inclusion in wheezy, fixing #640499. Of course the
> maintainers are welcome to do such an upload themselves.
> 
Sounds like the nvidia stuff was worked around some other way, so
closing.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: