Your message dated Thu, 08 Nov 2012 20:02:14 +0000 with message-id <1352404934.20648.8.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#692784: unblock: ircd-ircu/2.10.12.10.dfsg1-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #692784, regarding unblock: ircd-ircu/2.10.12.10.dfsg1-1.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 692784: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692784 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: unblock: ircd-ircu/2.10.12.10.dfsg1-1.1
- From: Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 20:26:54 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87sj8jzyip.fsf@brouzouf.villemot.name>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-CC: ircd-ircu@packages.debian.org Please unblock package ircd-ircu. The version currently in sid fixes RC bug #689893. The debdiff is attached. unblock ircd-ircu/2.10.12.10.dfsg1-1.1 Thanks,diff -u ircd-ircu-2.10.12.10.dfsg1/debian/dirs ircd-ircu-2.10.12.10.dfsg1/debian/dirs --- ircd-ircu-2.10.12.10.dfsg1/debian/dirs +++ ircd-ircu-2.10.12.10.dfsg1/debian/dirs @@ -4 +3,0 @@ -var/run/ircd diff -u ircd-ircu-2.10.12.10.dfsg1/debian/changelog ircd-ircu-2.10.12.10.dfsg1/debian/changelog --- ircd-ircu-2.10.12.10.dfsg1/debian/changelog +++ ircd-ircu-2.10.12.10.dfsg1/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +ircd-ircu (2.10.12.10.dfsg1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + + [ Thomas Goirand ] + * Fixes handling of /var/run/ircd life cycle (Closes: #689893, LP: #369115). + + -- Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> Mon, 05 Nov 2012 20:04:25 +0100 + ircd-ircu (2.10.12.10.dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=low * The "Omertà" release diff -u ircd-ircu-2.10.12.10.dfsg1/debian/rules ircd-ircu-2.10.12.10.dfsg1/debian/rules --- ircd-ircu-2.10.12.10.dfsg1/debian/rules +++ ircd-ircu-2.10.12.10.dfsg1/debian/rules @@ -92,7 +92,6 @@ # fix directory permissions for logdir chown -R irc:irc debian/ircd-ircu/var/log/ircd - chown -R irc:irc debian/ircd-ircu/var/run/ircd # move manpage mv debian/ircd-ircu/usr/share/man/man8/ircd.8 debian/ircd-ircu/usr/share/man/man8/ircd-ircu.8 diff -u ircd-ircu-2.10.12.10.dfsg1/debian/init ircd-ircu-2.10.12.10.dfsg1/debian/init --- ircd-ircu-2.10.12.10.dfsg1/debian/init +++ ircd-ircu-2.10.12.10.dfsg1/debian/init @@ -22,7 +22,15 @@ # where the irc-daemon is IRCD=/usr/sbin/ircd-ircu -PIDFILE=/var/run/ircd/ircd.pid +RUNDIR=/var/run/ircd +PIDFILE=${RUNDIR}/ircd.pid + +if [ ! -d ${RUNDIR} ] ; then + mkdir -p ${RUNDIR} || true + if [ -d ${RUNDIR} ] ; then + chown -R irc:irc ${RUNDIR} + fi +fi if [ -x "$IRCD" ]; then case "$1" in-- .''`. Sébastien Villemot : :' : Debian Developer `. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien `- GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594Attachment: pgplRvmtccr9J.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org>, 692784-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#692784: unblock: ircd-ircu/2.10.12.10.dfsg1-1.1
- From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 20:02:14 +0000
- Message-id: <1352404934.20648.8.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87sj8jzyip.fsf@brouzouf.villemot.name>
- References: <[🔎] 87sj8jzyip.fsf@brouzouf.villemot.name>
On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 20:26 +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > Please unblock package ircd-ircu. The version currently in sid fixes RC > bug #689893. The debdiff is attached. + if [ ! -d ${RUNDIR} ] ; then + mkdir -p ${RUNDIR} || true + if [ -d ${RUNDIR} ] ; then + chown -R irc:irc ${RUNDIR} + fi + fi This seems either overly complicated or not complicated enough. If the "mkdir -p" fails then the s-s-d call is presumably going to fail in any case, so the "|| true" and later -d are somewhat redundant. otoh, it's better than the current package and if the mkdir fails then a bunch of other stuff on the system will be broken; unblocked. Regards, Adam
--- End Message ---