[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#690074: marked as done (unblock: wpa/1.0-3)

Your message dated Wed, 7 Nov 2012 12:25:32 +0100
with message-id <20121107112532.GD17465@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690074: wpa will not migrate, upload to tpu?
has caused the Debian Bug report #690074,
regarding unblock: wpa/1.0-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
690074: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690074
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Hi,
please unblock wpa 1.0-3 . It fixes CVE-2012-4445.

I saw on IRC that it's currently held back due to it's udeb, but
let's file a bug to keep it on the radar.

Cheers,
        Moritz

unblock wpa/1.0-3

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 20:39:09 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 17:08:33 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > wpa has been updated in unstable for CVE-2012-4445, and subsequently
> > unblocked. However it picked up an enhanced dependency on pcsc-lite in
> > unstable and hence cannot migrate.
> > 
> > One solution could be to unblock pcsc-lite, but the feasibility of this I
> > leave up to the release team.
> > 
> > The other solution is an upload to tpu; I've just taken all changes from
> > unstable since they were already unblocked and hence deemed acceptable for
> > wheeze. See attached debdiff. If this is the preferred solution, let me
> > know so I can actually upload.
> > 
> The third solution is to fix libpcsclite1.symbols to not lie about the
> needed version, and then rebuild wpa.
> 
binNMUs scheduled against libpcsclite1 (>= 1.8.6-3).

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: