Re: Bug#669213: bind9: new upstream release: 9.9
- To: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- Cc: LaMont Jones <lamont@debian.org>, Sebastian Wiesinger <sebastian@karotte.org>, 669213@bugs.debian.org, ondrej@sury.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#669213: bind9: new upstream release: 9.9
- From: LaMont Jones <lamont@mmjgroup.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 14:30:13 -0600
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20121029203013.GA30198@mix.mmjgroup.com>
- Mail-followup-to: LaMont Jones <lamont@mmjgroup.com>, "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>, LaMont Jones <lamont@debian.org>, Sebastian Wiesinger <sebastian@karotte.org>, 669213@bugs.debian.org, ondrej@sury.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 6bfe1fe0102c318fa56816cf0211ca57@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
- References: <20121029141054.GA20921@danton.fire-world.de> <20121029144804.GA25096@mix.mmjgroup.com> <[🔎] 20121029164550.GA16811@waldi.eu.org> <[🔎] 6bfe1fe0102c318fa56816cf0211ca57@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:22:10PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Indeed. In any case, were the new version to be accepted in to the
> release then the appropriate route would be via unstable, not direct
> to t-p-u.
Works for me. I'll toss 9.8.4 into sid. As for getting it into wheezy,
it'll make the support life easier for the inevitable security fixes that
will follow. There are probably other reasons.
lamont
Reply to: