Bug#691676: unblock: ensymble/0.28-3
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-CC: eddy.petrisor@gmail.com
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 12:46:43PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:02:10PM +0300, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> > I realized the previous 0.28-2.1 proposal had UNRELEASED as suite.
> >
> > I corrected this and attached the patch based on ensymble 0.28-2 to
> > obtain 0.28-2.1.
> >
> > I would really prefer 0.29-1, but if not, Is this 0.28-2.1 version
> > acceptable for a new upload?
>
> Dear debian-release,
>
> Eddy Petrișor has provided updates to my (RFA) package ensymble,
> fixing an important bug (#629125) relating to python compatibility).
>
> There are two options here:
>
> - 0.28-3
> this is a minimal patch fixing #629125
(As Eddy points out this is actually #616799)
> - 0.29-1
> this is a new upstream release which also fixes #629125 (severity: normal)
> based on some work I did a while ago but never managed to upload
>
> I have reviewed both sets of changes proposed by Eddy and merged them
> into my git repository.
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/dom/ensymble.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.28
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/dom/ensymble.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/master
>
> I attach diffs for both. Note that the one including 0.29 is long because
> upstream has reorganised the directory layout, but the actual changes
> are minimal - see <http://code.google.com/p/ensymble/source/list>.
> I think both are suitable for wheezy.
>
> Please let me know which one you prefer, and I'll upload it.
In the interests in expedience and taking some workload off the
release team, I have uploaded 0.28-3 (which qualifies for an unblock as
is it is a minimal fix for an important bug in an optional package).
Please unblock:
unblock ensymble/0.28-3
Thanks,
Dominic.
--
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)
Reply to: