Re: Bug#629125: New version 0.29-1 of ensymble (fixes: #616799, #629125)
2012/10/21 Dominic Hargreaves <dom@earth.li>:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:02:10PM +0300, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>> I realized the previous 0.28-2.1 proposal had UNRELEASED as suite.
>>
>> I corrected this and attached the patch based on ensymble 0.28-2 to
>> obtain 0.28-2.1.
>>
>> I would really prefer 0.29-1, but if not, Is this 0.28-2.1 version
>> acceptable for a new upload?
>
> Dear debian-release,
>
> Eddy Petrișor has provided updates to my (RFA) package ensymble,
> fixing an important bug (#629125) relating to python compatibility).
It seems I am responsible for some confusion with bug numbers due to
cross posting (and a misleading commit message in git, but the
changelog is correct).
The python compatibility bug is #616799.
> There are two options here:
>
> - 0.28-3
> this is a minimal patch fixing #629125
> - 0.29-1
> this is a new upstream release which also fixes #629125 (severity: normal)
> based on some work I did a while ago but never managed to upload
0.28-3 contains the minimal patch to fix #616799 (the python issue)
0.29-1 fixes both #616799 (the python issue) and the upstream issue #629125
> I have reviewed both sets of changes proposed by Eddy and merged them
> into my git repository.
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/dom/ensymble.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.28
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/dom/ensymble.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/master
>
> I attach diffs for both. Note that the one including 0.29 is long because
> upstream has reorganised the directory layout, but the actual changes
> are minimal - see <http://code.google.com/p/ensymble/source/list>.
> I think both are suitable for wheezy.
Sorry for the confusion.
--
Regards,
EddyP
=============================================
The universe is not required to be in perfect harmony with human
ambition. - Carl Sagan
Reply to: