Bug#690795: marked as done (unblock: icedove/10.0.9-1)
Your message dated Thu, 18 Oct 2012 21:36:02 +0100
with message-id <1350592562.32448.11.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690795: unblock: icedove/10.0.9-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #690795,
regarding unblock: icedove/10.0.9-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
690795: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690795
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
please unblock icedove 10.0.9-1
It fixes multiple security issues
Cheers,
Moritz
unblock icedove/10.0.9-1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 22:31 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 08:08:11PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 08:38 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> > > I'm not sure wheter there is active _upstream_ security support for
> > > lightning but I guess thats not different from some other packages.
> > >
> > > One of the reasons to build iceowl-extension from icedove instead of
> > > iceowl was to get all the fixes that go into that source tree for free
> > > including security ones (which might not be the case for standalone
> > > iceowl) and to have in sync versions of those two. So the situation is
> > > certainly better than in squeeze. I'm also happy to backport security
> > > issues for iceowl-extension (knowledge permitting).
> >
> > Thanks for the explanation. I'm happy enough with that as long as Moritz
> > is.
>
> Yes, sure.
Unblocked.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
Reply to: