Bug#690795: unblock: icedove/10.0.9-1

["Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>]

On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 08:38 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> I'm not sure wheter there is active  _upstream_ security support for
> lightning but I guess thats not different from some other packages. 
> 
> One of the reasons to build iceowl-extension from icedove instead of
> iceowl was to get all the fixes that go into that source tree for free
> including security ones (which might not be the case for standalone
> iceowl) and to have in sync versions of those two. So the situation is
> certainly better than in squeeze. I'm also happy to backport security
> issues for iceowl-extension (knowledge permitting).

Thanks for the explanation. I'm happy enough with that as long as Moritz
is.

Regards,

Adam