On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 13:07:25 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > The diffs supplied originally in August are likely to be too large to > be acceptable as unblocks and I've been wondering about an alternative > solution for Wheezy. Thanks for looking into this; but I'd rather have an opinion from the release team before we start to remove half of Catalyst from wheezy (and leaving the other half in a broken state). > The one problematic bug is #680826 in > libtest-www-mechanize-catalyst-perl I don't think so ... > gitalist isn't a problem, libcatalyst-modules-perl and libmojomojo-perl > are problems for fixing #680826. > > However, the original email to debian-release did not cover how that > particular bug was to be fixed either. > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/08/msg01479.html ... because it builds fine against the new Catalyst: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680826#13 (also mentioned in the above mail) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: R.E.M.: All The Way To Reno
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature