[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#685597: marked as done (unblock: ppl/0.11.2-8)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 12:19:18 +0100
with message-id <61813d4ea4746ba53bc743a895350c75@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#685597: unblock: ppl/0.11.2-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #685597,
regarding unblock: ppl/0.11.2-8
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
685597: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685597
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

unblock to fix #669479, #680896 for wheezy. the split out ppl-config binary is
not used by apron and cloog-ppl, so no changes for build dependencies in other
packages are needed.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 13.10.2012 23:30, Philipp Kern wrote:

On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 08:09:08PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 12:07 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> unblock to fix #669479, #680896 for wheezy. the split out ppl-config binary is > not used by apron and cloog-ppl, so no changes for build dependencies in other 
> packages are needed.
Has it been verified that they build correctly against a multi-arched 
libppl?


Both have built successfully on zelenka against the following libppl:
ii libppl-c4:s390 0.11.2-8 s390 Parma Polyhedra Library (C interface) ii libppl0.11-dev:s390 0.11.2-8 s390 Parma Polyhedra Library (development) 
ii libppl9:s390         0.11.2-8 s390 Parma Polyhedra Library
(runtime library)


Unblocked.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---
Reply to: