On 10-10-12 21:41, Julien Cristau wrote: > Moving things away from /usr/share/cacti/site/plugins manually means any > update to the package won't be effective. Is there really no better way > of handling this? And one more thing related to the unblock request, just in case it was not clear already. In the current 0.8.8a-3 package, there is already the important softlink present, but it fails to work, as the reverse softlinks are not there and I can not create them. That is why I think it is better to NOT provide the link, but document the situation. So this unblock request is really to prevent failures. But do you suggest to not ship my proposed documentation and let sys-admins install in /usr/share/cacti/site/plugins? Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature