[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#683684: Subject: unblock: cacti/0.8.8a-4



On 10-10-12 21:41, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> sorry for the very late answer.

No problem.

>> +If you read this and care about keeping your system maintainable, please change
>> +the layout of the plugins structure of cacti. Due to the way a lot of plug-ins
>> +are written (details in bug #681558) in combination with Debian policy, I can
>> +not fix this in the package.

> Moving things away from /usr/share/cacti/site/plugins manually means any
> update to the package won't be effective.  Is there really no better way
> of handling this?

Actually, that is what I want. I want system administrators to install
plugins from the web outside of Debian controlled area. "I" might
otherwise damage those things upon upgrade. If I read the policy
correctly, this is exactly as intended, but I might be wrong. Rephrasing
a quote from one of the upstream developers, if the plugin is good
enough to be distributed, it should be in cacti itself. But of course I
will reconsider if you have good arguments. This is the best I could
come up with, and none of my co-maintainers responded.

Paul

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: