[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#690088: marked as done (unblock: tango/7.2.6+dfsg-14)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Oct 2012 21:23:23 +0100
with message-id <1349814203.26169.15.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690088: unblock: tango/7.2.6+dfsg-14
has caused the Debian Bug report #690088,
regarding unblock: tango/7.2.6+dfsg-14
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
690088: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690088
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package tango

it fix the bug #684332 which should have deserve an RC status.
I did not set it RC before closing it, but a non working init script is
Indeed an RC problem.

thanks

Frederic

unblock tango/7.2.6+dfsg-14

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-486

diff -Nru tango-7.2.6+dfsg/debian/changelog tango-7.2.6+dfsg/debian/changelog
--- tango-7.2.6+dfsg/debian/changelog	2012-02-26 12:09:20.000000000 +0100
+++ tango-7.2.6+dfsg/debian/changelog	2012-09-15 08:35:25.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+tango (7.2.6+dfsg-14) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * debian/patch
+    - 0002-debian-my.cnf.in.patch (updated) (Closes: #684332)
+      put the right user in my.cnf using dbconfig-common template engine
+
+ -- Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel <picca@debian.org>  Sat, 15 Sep 2012 08:31:51 +0200
+
 tango (7.2.6+dfsg-13) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.3
diff -Nru tango-7.2.6+dfsg/debian/patches/0002-debian-my.cnf.in.patch tango-7.2.6+dfsg/debian/patches/0002-debian-my.cnf.in.patch
--- tango-7.2.6+dfsg/debian/patches/0002-debian-my.cnf.in.patch	2011-10-21 22:28:02.000000000 +0200
+++ tango-7.2.6+dfsg/debian/patches/0002-debian-my.cnf.in.patch	2012-09-15 08:26:05.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
-From: =?UTF-8?q?Picca=20Fr=C3=A9d=C3=A9ric-Emmanuel?=
- <picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:25:38 +0100
+From: =?UTF-8?q?Picca=20Fr=C3=A9d=C3=A9ric-Emmanuel?= <picca@debian.org>
+Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 08:25:42 +0200
 Subject: debian/my.cnf.in
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
@@ -10,19 +9,20 @@
 
 Signed-off-by: Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel <picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
 ---
- cppserver/database/my.cnf.in |    9 ++++-----
- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
+ cppserver/database/my.cnf.in |   10 +++++-----
+ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
 
 diff --git a/cppserver/database/my.cnf.in b/cppserver/database/my.cnf.in
-index 69f574c..8bae2c7 100644
+index 69f574c..a43ae74 100644
 --- a/cppserver/database/my.cnf.in
 +++ b/cppserver/database/my.cnf.in
-@@ -29,11 +29,10 @@
+@@ -29,11 +29,11 @@
  # MySQL client library initialization.
  #
  [client]
 -#password	= [your_password]
 -#user			= [your_user]
++user		= _DBC_DBUSER_
 +password	= _DBC_DBPASS_
  
 -port			= 3306
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
  
  # *** Application-specific options follow here ***
  
-@@ -44,7 +43,7 @@ socket		= /tmp/mysql.sock
+@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ socket		= /tmp/mysql.sock
  
  # generic configuration options
  port		= 3306
@@ -41,4 +41,3 @@
  
  # back_log is the number of connections the operating system can keep in
  # the listen queue, before the MySQL connection manager thread has
---

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 22:14 +0200, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
> Please unblock package tango
> 
> it fix the bug #684332 which should have deserve an RC status.
> I did not set it RC before closing it, but a non working init script is
> Indeed an RC problem.

Unblocked; thanks.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---
Reply to: