[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#687477: unblock: poco/1.3.6p1-4

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 09:26:47 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:

> Hi Adam,
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 07:23:00AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > There seems to be some confusion here.  sitplus is _not_ in testing.  It
> > hasn't been in testing since June.
> Uhmmm, sorry for the confusion.  I never realised that it was removed.
> (I think I even somehow ignored one of your hints about this fact in the
> past because I was somehow sure that it was in ...)
> I can only tell for sure that sitplus was in testing at the point of
> creation of the Debian Med metapackages because it is recommended in
> med-rehabilitation.  This was in April and we did not recieved any RC
> bug against sitplus so I did not checked - perhaps it was just removed
> because of the missing Dependency.
It was removed because of #650059.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: