[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Dropping loop-aes-utils from d-i-meta-faux?

Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> (19/09/2012):
> loop-aes-utils was removed from unstable a while ago (see #680748).
> It's still in testing, because britney won't remove it due to a
> dependency from the "faux package" d-i-meta-faux.
> d-i-m-f ensures that a number of packages important to d-i are not
> accidentally removed from testing.  I'm not sure exactly how the
> original list was derived, but the current version can be found at
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=mirror/britney1.git;a=blob;f=fauxpkg/noremove.d/d-i.list;hb=1a77a0b546b4d53c8ecf7562b236684df0a1362e
> Does it still make sense for that list to include loop-aes-utils, or
> should we remove it, thus allowing l-a-e to be dropped from wheezy?

I think it's OK to remove, fast is good. If anything breaks, it'd be
nice to still have a few days to fix it. ;)


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: