Hi Adam, On 15.09.2012 18:24, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > iirc I skipped it on a recent run through looking for possible unblocks, > as it wasn't entirely clear to me why the absolute_import changes had > been added and whether they might have any non-obvious impact. They > don't appear to be in upstream's version of the fix. Fair enough. > There's already a request as #686547, and an earlier mail to the > maintainers requesting a t-p-u upload > (<MID:[🔎] 50431AD9.2060909@thykier.net>). > Sorry, you're right. I missed that. That said, I may prepare a NMU to apologize for making your work :) >> Package dnsmasq-base/2.63-3 >> >> #686694 -- dnsmasq-base: fails to install: missing Depends: adduser >> >> There is a maintainer upload which adds a new upstream version as >> well (despite the missing changelog entry mentioning that). The same as >> for calibre applies here, a debdiff is not attached due to its size. > > There's also a moving around of package content. The new upstream's > debian changelog is dated mid-June, but it doesn't seem to have been > uploaded until two months later. :-( I tried to backport the patch right now until I realized the issue was in Sid only. The Wheezy package does not include any maintainer script for dnsmasq-base. Weird rules files FTW. I've properly tagged #686694 now, so that Wheezy is not affected anymore. -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature