[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#686644: marked as done (unblock: net-tools/1.60-24.2)



Your message dated Sat, 08 Sep 2012 22:34:01 +0100
with message-id <1347140041.8753.76.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#686644: unblock: net-tools/1.60-24.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #686644,
regarding unblock: net-tools/1.60-24.2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
686644: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686644
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package net-tools.

This upload fixes quite annoying bug #680204, and also #656130, which is
important to fix release goal regarding hardening flags. To fix #656130
minor changes were needed to the source, as printf-like functions were
misused few times, causing FTBFS with hardening flags. Debdiff of the
NMU is attached for the review.

unblock net-tools/1.60-24.2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.5-trunk-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -u net-tools-1.60/debian/rules net-tools-1.60/debian/rules
--- net-tools-1.60/debian/rules
+++ net-tools-1.60/debian/rules
@@ -19,6 +19,9 @@
 CROSS=
 endif
 
+COPTS := -D_GNU_SOURCE -Wall $(shell dpkg-buildflags --get CFLAGS) $(shell dpkg-buildflags --get CPPFLAGS)
+LOPTS := $(shell dpkg-buildflags --get LDFLAGS)
+
 configure: configure-stamp
 configure-stamp: $(QUILT_STAMPFN)
 	[ ! -f config.make ] || mv config.make debian/config.make.bk
@@ -31,7 +34,7 @@
 build: build-stamp
 build-stamp: configure-stamp
 	dh_testdir
-	$(MAKE) $(CROSS) PROGS="ifconfig arp netstat route rarp slattach plipconfig \
+	$(MAKE) $(CROSS) COPTS="$(COPTS)" LOPTS="$(LOPTS)" PROGS="ifconfig arp netstat route rarp slattach plipconfig \
 		nameif iptunnel ipmaddr mii-tool"
 	touch $@
 
diff -u net-tools-1.60/debian/changelog net-tools-1.60/debian/changelog
--- net-tools-1.60/debian/changelog
+++ net-tools-1.60/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+net-tools (1.60-24.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Parse Linux version correctly (Closes: #680204).
+  * Build with hardening flags (Closes: #656130):
+    - Fix improper format function usage: use fputs instead of fprintf or pass
+      "%s" format string where necessary (-Werror=format-security treats those
+      as errors).
+
+ -- Andrew O. Shadura <bugzilla@tut.by>  Tue, 04 Sep 2012 10:51:20 +0200
+
 net-tools (1.60-24.1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -u net-tools-1.60/debian/patches/series net-tools-1.60/debian/patches/series
--- net-tools-1.60/debian/patches/series
+++ net-tools-1.60/debian/patches/series
@@ -24,0 +25,2 @@
+proper-uts-check.patch
+fix-fprintf.patch
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- net-tools-1.60.orig/debian/patches/proper-uts-check.patch
+++ net-tools-1.60/debian/patches/proper-uts-check.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+Subject: Linux version now can be two-component.
+
+--- a/lib/util.c
++++ b/lib/util.c
+@@ -33,11 +33,11 @@
+ int kernel_version(void)
+ {
+     struct utsname uts;
+-    int major, minor, patch;
++    int major = 0, minor = 0, patch = 0;
+ 
+     if (uname(&uts) < 0)
+ 	return -1;
+-    if (sscanf(uts.release, "%d.%d.%d", &major, &minor, &patch) != 3)
++    if (sscanf(uts.release, "%d.%d.%d", &major, &minor, &patch) < 2)
+ 	return -1;
+     return KRELEASE(major, minor, patch);
+ }
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- net-tools-1.60.orig/debian/patches/fix-fprintf.patch
+++ net-tools-1.60/debian/patches/fix-fprintf.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+Subject: Fix improper format function usage.
+
+--- a/rarp.c
++++ b/rarp.c
+@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
+ 
+ static char no_rarp_message[] = N_("This kernel does not support RARP.\n");
+ 
+-static char version_string[] = RELEASE "\nrarp 1.03 (2001-04-04)\n";
++static char version_string[] = RELEASE "\nrarp 1.03 (2001-04-04)";
+ 
+ static struct hwtype *hardware = NULL;
+ 
+@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@
+ 	case 'h':
+ 	    usage();
+ 	case 'V':
+-	    fprintf(stderr, version_string);
++	    fputs(version_string, stderr);
+ 	    exit(E_VERSION);
+ 	    break;
+ 	case 'v':
+--- a/slattach.c
++++ b/slattach.c
+@@ -565,9 +565,9 @@
+ 	  "[-o outfill] "
+ #endif
+ 	  "[-c cmd] [-s speed] [-p protocol] tty | -\n"
+-	  "       slattach -V | --version\n";
++	  "       slattach -V | --version";
+ 
+-  fprintf(stderr, usage_msg);
++  fputs(usage_msg, stderr);
+   exit(1);
+ }
+ 
+--- a/mii-tool.c
++++ b/mii-tool.c
+@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@
+ 
+     if (opt_watch) {
+ 	if (opt_log) {
+-	    syslog(LOG_INFO, buf);
++	    syslog(LOG_INFO, "%s", buf);
+ 	} else {
+ 	    char s[20];
+ 	    time_t t = time(NULL);

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 21:50 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 11:48 +0200, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> > Well, that's my second unblock request, so I'm not that familiar with
> > this; but yes, I was asking for pre-upload approval prior to the upload
> > itself.
> 
> Please go ahead; thanks.

I was assuming you'd tell us once it had been uploaded, although I
realise I didn't actually specify that; sorry.  Unblocked.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---

Reply to: