Bug#686041: nmu: python-scientific_2.8-3
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Le 07/09/2012 11:23, Sébastien Villemot a écrit :
>>>> Le 27/08/2012 19:03, David Prévot a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Could you please trigger a rebuild, to make the package work again
>>>>> (fixing an RC-bug)? Thanks in advance.
Thanks to Sébastien's explanations, I hereby propose a less dummy
changelog entry for this binNMU request:
> nmu python-scientific_2.8-3 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against python-numpy 1:1.6.2-1; fixes: #685812"
> So my understanding is that the problem comes from some ABI breakage in
> python-numpy, which was not followed by a recompilation of python-netcdf.
>
> What I don't understand however is that the python-numpy
> maintainers/upstream claim that there was no ABI breakage between
> 1:1.5.1-4 and 1:1.6.2-1 (see the Provides field of python-numpy). Either
> I am missing something or that claim is wrong.
The package rebuild against the last python-numpy version (1:1.6.2-1)
also works with python-numpy 1:1.6.1-1, confirming Sébastien's analysis,
with an ABI breakage introduced in python-numpy 1:1.6.1-1.
Regards
David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=KYbD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: