[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#684735: marked as done (unblock: ganglia (security))

Your message dated Fri, 31 Aug 2012 21:19:12 +0200
with message-id <20120831191912.GM6588@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#684735: unblock: ganglia (security)
has caused the Debian Bug report #684735,
regarding unblock: ganglia (security)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
684735: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684735
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: grave
Tags: security


Short summary of request: please give authorization to

a) upload ganglia 3.3.8-1 to unstable

b) unblocking 3.3.8-1 to wheezy after appropriate cooling-off period



Longer summary:

- there is a security vulnerability - this unblock has inherited the
`grave' severity from the other bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683584

- 3.3.6 and 3.3.7 also contain essential fixes for memory leak and seg
fault issues

- the 3.3 branch is a stable branch that doesn't contain aggressive
changes or new features - I have made up the 3.3.x series upstream
releases myself so I have seen all the changes

- the package changes can be browsed in the VCS:
http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/ganglia.git;a=summary

- the detailed log of upstream changes can be browsed in github:
https://github.com/ganglia/ganglia-web/commits/release/3.3

Regards,

Daniel

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 21:30:23 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> 
> On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 19:54 +0000, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> > n 14/08/12 19:03, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 14:11 +0000, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> > >>> Please could we have a full source debdiff for a proposed upload as part
> > >>> of this bug log?  It makes it far clearer what was requested to be acked
> > >>> and what was (or wasn't) acked.
> > >>
> > >> debdiff attached
> > > 
> > > Thanks.  A few queries:
> 
> Thanks for the explanations.  With the changes discussed, please go
> ahead and let us know once the package has been accepted.
> 
Unblocked.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: