On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 22:08:21 +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote:
> Would an updated package, with changes over 1:1.18.1-1 as shown in the
> attached patch, be acceptable for wheezy?
>
[...]
> diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
> index bfdf63e..e4c5c0a 100644
> --- a/debian/changelog
> +++ b/debian/changelog
> @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
> +libguestfs (1:1.18.1-1wheezy1) testing; urgency=low
> +
> + * [40d6de2] Remove useless dh_python* overrides (Closes: #681587)
> +
> + -- Hilko Bengen <bengen@debian.org> Sat, 21 Jul 2012 16:36:10 +0200
> +
> libguestfs (1:1.18.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * New upstream version
> diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
> index 6386c1d..f496a8e 100755
> --- a/debian/rules
> +++ b/debian/rules
> @@ -126,13 +126,6 @@ override_dh_install:
> erlang-depends -perlang-guestfs
> dh_install
>
> -# Workaround for python3-defaults < 3.2~b2-1
> -# ("do not rename .so files outside dist-packages directory")
> -override_dh_python3:
> - dh_python3 -p python-libguestfs
> -override_dh_python2:
> - dh_python2 -p python-libguestfs -V 2.6-
> -
> # Workaround for Lintian warning
> # "{pre,post}inst-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig"
> override_dh_makeshlibs:
> git finished.
If that results in correct dependencies then yes, it seems acceptable.
Thanks,
Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature