[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#683316: marked as done (unblock: mtink/1.0.16-6)

Your message dated Mon, 06 Aug 2012 19:28:26 +0200
with message-id <501FFEBA.80906@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#683316: unblock: mtink/1.0.16-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #683316,
regarding unblock: mtink/1.0.16-6
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
683316: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683316
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package mtink

Two FTBFS issues fixed: one for new lesstif2 (which is not in wheezy
yet), the other for dpkg-dev 'binary' vs 'binary-arch'.

Unfortunately I wasn't thinking of targetting wheezy at the time, so
there are a couple of minor cleanups in 1.0.16-5 and 1.0.16-6.  The
package is QA-maintained, after all.  The debdiff is still quite small.

unblock mtink/1.0.16-6

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2012-07-30 20:12, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> 
> Please unblock package mtink
> 
> Two FTBFS issues fixed: one for new lesstif2 (which is not in wheezy
> yet), the other for dpkg-dev 'binary' vs 'binary-arch'.
> 
> Unfortunately I wasn't thinking of targetting wheezy at the time, so
> there are a couple of minor cleanups in 1.0.16-5 and 1.0.16-6.  The
> package is QA-maintained, after all.  The debdiff is still quite small.
> 
> unblock mtink/1.0.16-6
> 
> [...]
> 


Unblocked, thanks.

~Niels

--- End Message ---
Reply to: