Re: Next upload 2012-06-26 (dpkg 1.16.5)
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 11:45:37 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 12:40 +0200, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > Oh, and also, I want to see a specific ack/nack from the SRMs for:
> > --- dpkg-1.16.4.3/debian/source/options 2012-06-09 14:32:05.000000000 +0000
> > +++ dpkg-1.16.8/debian/source/options 2012-07-19 12:27:34.000000000 +0000
> > @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
> > -# Use bzip2 compression by default, we save 2.5Mb
> > -compression = "bzip2"
> > +# Use xz compression by default, we save 4.6 MiB
> > +compression = "xz"
>
> afaics, this is just the "upstream" dpkg tarball changing compression
> method. Does anything actually care about that?
Exactly, in Debian this should not affect anything AFAIK, the only
ones who might be “affected” are dpkg downstreams, and the ones I'm
tracking do not seem to have complained; but then they always have
the option to repack the tarball.
thanks,
guillem
Reply to: