On 2012-07-21 19:29, Julien Cristau wrote:
| On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 20:00:38 +0300, jaalto wrote:
|
| > On 2012-07-21 12:39, Julien Cristau wrote:
| > | On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 18:47:14 +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
| > |
| > | > Add required font package to debian/control::Recommends
| > | >
| > | Making the software deal sanely with a missing font (where "SIGSEGV"
| > | doesn't count as "sane") is not an option?
| >
| > The policy says that font packages are not allowed to be listed in
| > debian/control::Depends. If this is permissable to be overridden, I
| > can move it from Recommends to Depends.
| >
| That's not what I meant.
Given the release time frame, upstream probably is unable to provide
updates on this at code level.
To improve it for release, I'm wondering if it would be more sensible
to play it safe and use:
debian/controll::Depends
Currenly the measures in 1.3-10 are the ones that are allowed by
policy.
JariAttachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature