Your message dated Sat, 21 Jul 2012 00:30:52 +0200 with message-id <20120720223052.GA21084@elende> and subject line Re: Bug#680961: unblock: redhat-cluster/3.0.12-3.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #680961, regarding unblock: redhat-cluster/3.0.12-3.2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 680961: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680961 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: unblock: redhat-cluster/3.0.12-3.2
- From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 16:31:30 +0200
- Message-id: <20120709143130.11659.2754.reportbug@elende.valinor.li>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Hi Release-Team I would like to ask for a freeze-exception for redhat-cluster 3.0.12-3.2 uploaded as NMU to unstable. I encoutered redhat-cluster during searching to help on RC bugs for wheezy. I added two patches, I agree that afterwards I should only have added the patch for the FTBFS. Please let me know if I should revert the second first. First the diffstat: diffstat for redhat-cluster_3.0.12-3.1 redhat-cluster_3.0.12-3.2 debian/patches/0006-Fix-FTBFS-due-to-moved-header-files.patch | 36 ++++++++++ debian/patches/0007-Add-remote_fs-to-Required-Start-and-Required-Stop.patch | 32 ++++++++ redhat-cluster-3.0.12/debian/changelog | 11 +++ redhat-cluster-3.0.12/debian/patches/series | 2 4 files changed, 81 insertions(+) The first patch 0006-Fix-FTBFS-due-to-moved-header-files.patch is to fix the FTBFS[1]. [1]: http://bugs.debian.org/669446 This was due to pacemaker moved header files. The second patch is 0007-Add-remote_fs-to-Required-Start-and-Required-Stop.patch. It is to add $remote_fs facility to Required-Start and Required-Stop to the initscripts for gfs and gfs2[2]. [2]: http://lintian.debian.org/tags/init.d-script-missing-dependency-on-remote_fs.html Should I remove this one? I'm sorry It was not my intention to put extra work on you. A side note: redhat-cluster has still 1 further serious release-critical bug[3]. It is about co-installability of rgmanager and resource-agents (both maintained by Debian HA Maintainers), which is still unresolved. [3]: http://bugs.debian.org/649068 In case you agree on all the above: unblock redhat-cluster/3.0.12-3.2 Many thanks for you work! Regards, Salvatore -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 680961-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#680961: unblock: redhat-cluster/3.0.12-3.2
- From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 00:30:52 +0200
- Message-id: <20120720223052.GA21084@elende>
- In-reply-to: <20120709143130.11659.2754.reportbug@elende.valinor.li>
- References: <20120709143130.11659.2754.reportbug@elende.valinor.li>
Hi Release-Team This was already unblocked. Regards, SalvatoreAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---