Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2012 16:37:18 +0200 with message-id <20120630143718.GP5434@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#666126: transition: poppler 0.18 has caused the Debian Bug report #666126, regarding transition: poppler 0.18 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 666126: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666126 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: poppler 0.18
- From: Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 23:52:45 +0200
- Message-id: <20120328215245.25483.39058.reportbug@localhost.localdomain>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, I would like to ask a slot for a Poppler 0.18.x transition. Currently there is Poppler 0.18.4 in experimental already. Please note that there are still few issues that prevents it to be started, so I'm filing this at this time to have this transition considered by release-team. This transition impacts the existing poppler libraries in the following ways: - libpoppler13 → libpoppler19 - libpoppler-glib6 → libpoppler-glib8 - libpoppler-qt4-3 -- BC with 0.16, but bumps shlibs Below it is a list of sources which are touched by the transition, and their situation, sorted by solutions: Sources that compile fine, and can be binNMU'ed: apvlv (poppler-glib) auto-multiple-choice (poppler) calibre (poppler) cups-filters (poppler) epdfview (poppler-glib) evince (poppler-glib) gdcm (poppler) gimp (poppler-glib) gnome-commander (poppler) gpdftext (poppler-glib) gummi (poppler-glib) inkscape (poppler, poppler-glib) koffice (poppler) libreoffice (poppler) openscenegraph (poppler-glib) pdf-presenter-console (poppler-glib) pdf2djvu (poppler) pdf2svg (poppler-glib) pdfcube (poppler-glib) pdfgrep (poppler) pdftoipe (poppler) popplerkit.framework (poppler) referencer (poppler-glib) ruby-gnome2 (poppler-glib) texlive-bin (poppler) tracker (poppler-glib) tumbler (poppler-glib) webkit2pdf (poppler-glib) xournal (poppler-glib) xpdf (poppler) zathura (poppler-glib) Sources that currently FTBFS: * gambas2 (poppler) In a private talk with the gambas2 maintainer, he told me gambas2 is not fit for wheezy and it will be replaced ASAP with gambas3. No timing yet, though. The gambas2 FTBFS has been reported as #651386. * luatex (poppler) This is #651169. * poppler-sharp (poppler-glib) This is an arch:all package, so it needs a sourceful upload. It is #651385 and set as pending since some time. * python-poppler (poppler-glib) The (small) patch needed to compile with poppler 0.18 breaks compatibility with python apps using the few poppler-glib functions dropped in poppler 0.16, so it cannot be uploaded right now. Bug is #651388, and it will need a sourceful upload. Other cases: * derivations (poppler) This source builds a libpoppler-based utility application which is only used during the build to generate other data, and no trace of that application are left in the resulting arch:all package. This source can be left out of the transition (and it compiles fine with poppler 0.18 anyway). * pdfshuffler (python-poppler) Due to the API loss in poppler-glib (the ones that require a patch in python-poppler, see above) it will not run with a python-poppler patched as in #651388. It has been reported as #660937, and it is fixed upstream (with maintainer waiting for an upstream release). I grouped all the bugs mentioned above (even the solved ones) with the following usertag: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=pino@debian.org;tag=poppler-0.18 A tracker for poppler would have - "affected" packages: b-d on libpoppler-dev or libpoppler-private-dev or libpoppler-glib-dev or libpoppler-qt4-dev - "bad" packages: depends on libpoppler13 or libpoppler-glib6 - "good" packages: depends on libpoppler19 or libpoppler-glib8 .... but since you already created it on my request, thanks! Thanks, -- Pino
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org>, 666126-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#666126: transition: poppler 0.18
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 16:37:18 +0200
- Message-id: <20120630143718.GP5434@radis.cristau.org>
- In-reply-to: <20120328215245.25483.39058.reportbug@localhost.localdomain>
- References: <20120328215245.25483.39058.reportbug@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 23:52:45 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > I would like to ask a slot for a Poppler 0.18.x transition. > Currently there is Poppler 0.18.4 in experimental already. Please note > that there are still few issues that prevents it to be started, > so I'm filing this at this time to have this transition considered > by release-team. > > This transition impacts the existing poppler libraries in the following ways: > - libpoppler13 → libpoppler19 > - libpoppler-glib6 → libpoppler-glib8 > - libpoppler-qt4-3 -- BC with 0.16, but bumps shlibs > AFAICT that's all done, closing. Cheers, JulienAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---