[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#547393: marked as done (transition: libjpeg8)

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2012 16:28:13 +0200
with message-id <20120630142813.GO5434@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: state of libjpeg transition
has caused the Debian Bug report #547393,
regarding transition: libjpeg8
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

547393: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=547393
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Owner: madcoder@debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Meta-bug to track libjpeg62 -> libjpeg7 transition

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 18:19:20 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:

> Dear release team,
> I have NMUed most of the remaining packages that build-depended on libjpeg62-dev.
> I think the only remaining packages are:
>   compiz-fusion-plugins-main
>   kphotoalbum
> but they seems quite old.
compiz-foo was removed from testing, kphotoalbum was fixed.  I'm closing
the transition bug as done.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

--- End Message ---

Reply to: