[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#675968: transition: biosig4c++



Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Please pardon me for apparently missing an important advisory for not using
experimental first...  Transition is tiny -- just 2 dependent packages on
libbiosig-dev packages (below).  "Transition bug" against biosig4c++ source is
#675967.  Outstanding FTBFS on ia64 was fixed  (closed now) and I expect it to
build fine on sparc (which would resolve #633346) 

The following source packages need to be rebuilt:

sigviewer     # this one might need a compatibility patch -- although seems to build nicely without
openwalnut

In terms of 'ben' lingo, my non-experienced guestimate that the transition
should have the following parameters:

Affected: .build-depends ~ /libbiosig-dev/
Good: .depends ~ /lbbiosig1/
Bad: .depends ~ /lbbiosig0/

What should be my course of action -- should I just close a transition
bug (#675967) whenever transition slot is allocated?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental'), (100, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash



Reply to: