Hi Dne Mon, 4 Jun 2012 10:42:26 +0200 Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> napsal(a): > There aren't too many reverse dependencies. Please have a look at them, > and file serious bugs if they FTBFS or aren't functional with those new > rpm libraries. If it doesn't look too bad, I think we can still make > this transition happen. I'll just hold back on the binNMUs until you > write a little revdeps summary. ;) All of them build just fine against new RPM with exception of fossology which did already FTBFS [1]. There is no need to binNMU rpm2html as I've already uploaded new version with few other fixes. [1]:http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674381 -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature