Re: Architecture qualification
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 09:08:15PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 20:44:20 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>
>> Also, for ia64 we *could* consider (as long as there is no serious
>> hickup - #638068 is serious) that we release with ia64 but given to
>> the lack of real porters left we already decide now to drop ia64
>> directly after the release of wheezy. Actually that is what I would
>> expect unless someone is clearly willing (and ready) to work on it
>> from here on.
>>
>I think it's pretty clear ia64 is going away post wheezy anyway.
If it's that clear that it doesn't make sense after wheezy, is it
clear enough that it still makes sense *in* wheezy?
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com
Can't keep my eyes from the circling sky,
Tongue-tied & twisted, Just an earth-bound misfit, I...
Reply to: