Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2012 19:25:11 +0200 with message-id <[🔎] 20120525172511.GV31090@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#674293: NMU: rebuilds for adblock-plus has caused the Debian Bug report #674293, regarding NMU: rebuilds for adblock-plus to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 674293: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674293 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: pkg-mozext-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
- Subject: NMU: rebuilds for adblock-plus
- From: Andrea Veri <and@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 11:20:28 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20120524092028.GA8858@debian.org>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi, we (pkg-mozext) currently introduced a change of behaviour on the mozilla-devscripts package when processing the automatic setup of {xpi:Breaks} matching a certain field on the max_version on the install.rdf. As you can see at [1], the automatic generation of the breaks field has been disabled from the extensions that have their max_version >= 10. (from iceweasel-10 all the extensions are compatible by default, thus max_version isn't checked at all and there's no point in creating a relevant {xpi:Breaks} field) That said, I would like to request a binNMU of the adblock-plus package which is affected by the old {xpi:Breaks} issue: nmu adblock-plus . ALL . -m "Rebuild against mozilla-devscripts 0.32 and prevent the generation of a wrong {xpi:Breaks} field." cheers, Andrea [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-mozext/mozilla-devscripts.git;a=commit;h=69fa5a271fa68527b5c67ccb314588a3a1bdfb17Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Andrea Veri <and@debian.org>, 674293-done@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: submit@bugs.debian.org, pkg-mozext-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#674293: NMU: rebuilds for adblock-plus
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 19:25:11 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20120525172511.GV31090@radis.cristau.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20120524092028.GA8858@debian.org>
- References: <[🔎] 20120524092028.GA8858@debian.org>
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:20:28 +0200, Andrea Veri wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > Usertags: binnmu > > Hi, > > we (pkg-mozext) currently introduced a change of behaviour on the > mozilla-devscripts package when processing the automatic setup of > {xpi:Breaks} matching a certain field on the max_version on the > install.rdf. > > As you can see at [1], the automatic generation of the breaks field > has been disabled from the extensions that have their max_version >= > 10. (from iceweasel-10 all the extensions are compatible by default, > thus max_version isn't checked at all and there's no point in creating > a relevant {xpi:Breaks} field) > > That said, I would like to request a binNMU of the adblock-plus > package which is affected by the old {xpi:Breaks} issue: > > nmu adblock-plus . ALL . -m "Rebuild against mozilla-devscripts 0.32 and prevent the generation of a wrong {xpi:Breaks} field." > No can do. adblock-plus is an arch:all package. Cheers, JulienAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---