Re: broken cvs in squeeze-security
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 11:43 +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Bernhard R. Link dixit:
> >The following patch moves he deletion behind dh_compress,
> >thus actually matching something.
>
> OK. Thanks!
fwiw, I assume s/\.gz//g on the affected lines would also have worked.
> Should I upload this, or does someone else (security team?
> stable release team?) want to do it? If I should upload it,
> where (as strictly spoken it’s not a security issue)?
You seem slightly confused about the role of the release team and
security team here.
I'd be prepared to look at getting the underlying issue fixed in stable.
For that to happen, please could someone provide a full source debdiff
for an updated package.
> Just scheduling a binNMU in stable would almost certainly
> have taken care of it as well, so if that option persists,
> I’d not be opposed to it. It’s probably easier, too…
I assume you meant stable-security here? Scheduling a binNMU in stable
won't help anyone who isn't using proposed-updates.
I've scheduled a binNMU on amd64 for stable-security.
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: