[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: iceweasel-l10n-all on mips



Hi,

Am Mittwoch, den 04.04.2012, 20:00 +0100 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 20:39 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > So clearly, 10.0.3esr-2 is the version of the iceweasel source on 
> > mips.
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > But why is then only a selection of its arch:all packages in the
> > Packages file for testing, and iceweasel-l10n-all is missing?
> 
> This is a non-sequitur.  All of the arch:all packages built by the
> version of iceweasel in testing are also in testing, and in the packages
> files on all architectures.
> 
> iceweasel 10.0.3esr-2 doesn't build a binary package named
> iceweasel-l10n-all.  The binary that used to exist was built by the
> iceweasel-l10n source package, which was removed from unstable on
> Saturday and subsequently automatically dropped from testing on Sunday.
> 
> fwiw, a search of ftp-master's published removals file would show most
> of the above paragraph, as would judicious poking at
> packages.{qa.,}debian.org.
> 
> > In fact, no iceweasel-l10n-all exists in testing at all, not even for
> > other architectures, while it ist present in unstable for all of them,
> > and for most of them in version 10.0.3esr-3.
> 
> Yes.  iceweasel 10.0.3esr-3 started building the iceweasel-l10n-all
> binary package.  Those architectures which have binary packages for -3
> will also have iceweasel-l10n-all in their packages file; those which
> have only successfully built -2 won't.
> 
> iceweasel 10.0.3esr-3 isn't in testing, nor is iceweasel-l10n; it
> therefore follows that iceweasel-l10n-all is not in testing.

This makes all perfect sense to me, and what I expected, if there were
not for this entry:

$ cat unstable/Packages_mips|grep-dctrl -FVersion 10.0.3esr-2|grep-dctrl -FPackage iceweasel-l10n-all
Package: iceweasel-l10n-all
Source: iceweasel
Version: 10.0.3esr-2
Installed-Size: 137

How can there be a iceweasel-l10n-all of version 10.0.3esr-2 if, as you
say, “iceweasel 10.0.3esr-2 doesn't build a binary package named
iceweasel-l10n-all.”

(Sorry for not making this point clearer in the first mail.)

Thanks,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: