Re: iceweasel-l10n-all on mips
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 20:39 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> So clearly, 10.0.3esr-2 is the version of the iceweasel source on mips.
Yes.
> But why is then only a selection of its arch:all packages in the
> Packages file for testing, and iceweasel-l10n-all is missing?
This is a non-sequitur. All of the arch:all packages built by the
version of iceweasel in testing are also in testing, and in the packages
files on all architectures.
iceweasel 10.0.3esr-2 doesn't build a binary package named
iceweasel-l10n-all. The binary that used to exist was built by the
iceweasel-l10n source package, which was removed from unstable on
Saturday and subsequently automatically dropped from testing on Sunday.
fwiw, a search of ftp-master's published removals file would show most
of the above paragraph, as would judicious poking at
packages.{qa.,}debian.org.
> In fact, no iceweasel-l10n-all exists in testing at all, not even for
> other architectures, while it ist present in unstable for all of them,
> and for most of them in version 10.0.3esr-3.
Yes. iceweasel 10.0.3esr-3 started building the iceweasel-l10n-all
binary package. Those architectures which have binary packages for -3
will also have iceweasel-l10n-all in their packages file; those which
have only successfully built -2 won't.
iceweasel 10.0.3esr-3 isn't in testing, nor is iceweasel-l10n; it
therefore follows that iceweasel-l10n-all is not in testing.
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: