On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 00:35:12 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Reverse-dependencies of lam left in testing: > > - apbs; binNMUs scheduled > > mips failed, the rest are ok. > Filed a bug for the mips FTBFS (#663894) > > - cctools; fixed in unstable, but FTBFS (#661658) Still unfixed. > > - clustalw-mpi; needs a bug filed > > Filed, and closed. But will need builds on a bunch of archs. > Still unfixed. > > - fftw; binNMUs scheduled > > All built, looks like mips/mipsel had expired keys so will need a > reupload once that's sorted. > Fixed. > > - gerris; FTBFS (#652258) Still unfixed. > > - ghemical; binNMUs scheduled > > Failed (because mpqc was still built against lam, I think). Should be > given back I guess. > Given back now. > > - hdf5; needs #631019 sorted so libhdf5-lam-1.8.4 can be removed Still true. > > - hpcc; binNMUs scheduled > > Will need a reupload on mips once keys are sorted. > Fixed. > > - libghemical; binNMUs scheduled > > Failed because of #661674 I think. > Given back. > > - libgpiv; FTBFS (#657199) > > - mpqc; FTBFS on mips, given back for now > > - mrbayes; unbuildable on kfreebsd (#661659, #661663) All three still unfixed AFAICT. > > - mumps; in the middle of a SONAME bump (#650642, #659898, #651452, > > something else with getdp, petsc/slepc's own bumps This one's now gone. > > - netpipe; #571449 Still unfixed. > > - parmetis; binNMUs scheduled > > - regina-normal; binNMUs scheduled > Fixed. > > - rmpi; binNMUs scheduled > > FTBFS, needs a bug filed. > Filed . > > - starpu; binNMUs scheduled > > Looks ok modulo buildd key issues. > Fixed. > > - tessa; fixed in sid > > Needs a fixed pytables before it can migrate. > Still an issue, pytables is blocked by a numexpr bug AIUI. > > - xmpi; #571448, should apparently be removed I'll remove it from testing now. I'd appreciate some help from the mpi maintainers to make progress here. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature