Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:07:45 +0100 with message-id <20120214130745.GF10062@mraw.org> and subject line Re: Bug#657288: transition: gdcm has caused the Debian Bug report #657288, regarding transition: gdcm to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 657288: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=657288 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: gdcm
- From: Mathieu Malaterre <mathieu.malaterre@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:13:55 +0100
- Message-id: <20120125101355.18716.9444.reportbug@hpdesk.malat.net>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition GDCM 2.2.0 introduces a new ABI, as seen on #655783 and al. Since API (whatever that means for C++) is preserved, would it be a good time to - move gdcm 2.2.0 from experimental to unstable - binNMU insighttoolkit igstk is not using gdcm API and thus does not required a rebuild Thanks -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.1 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable'), (200, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Mathieu Malaterre <mathieu.malaterre@gmail.com>, 657288-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#657288: transition: gdcm
- From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:07:45 +0100
- Message-id: <20120214130745.GF10062@mraw.org>
- In-reply-to: <20120125101355.18716.9444.reportbug@hpdesk.malat.net>
- References: <20120125101355.18716.9444.reportbug@hpdesk.malat.net>
Mathieu Malaterre <mathieu.malaterre@gmail.com> (25/01/2012): > GDCM 2.2.0 introduces a new ABI, as seen on #655783 and al. Since API > (whatever that means for C++) is preserved, would it be a good time to > - move gdcm 2.2.0 from experimental to unstable > - binNMU insighttoolkit > > igstk is not using gdcm API and thus does not required a rebuild AFAICT: Everything's done, closing. Mraw, KiBi.Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---