Bug#657288: transition: gdcm
On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 11:13 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> GDCM 2.2.0 introduces a new ABI, as seen on #655783 and al.
> Since API (whatever that means for C++) is preserved, would it be a good time to
> - move gdcm 2.2.0 from experimental to unstable
We've covered that one already. :-)
> - binNMU insighttoolkit
I've now scheduled that and will look at scheduling the other packages
(see http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gdcm.html) once
> igstk is not using gdcm API and thus does not required a rebuild
What about the other packages which appear to build-depend on gdcm but
not end up with a run-time dependency? According to the tracker, that'd
be ants, itksnap and vtkedge.