Re: Plans for ITK version 4
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 4:43 AM, Steve M. Robbins <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 08:38:44AM -0500, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:
>> Thanks for all the work.
>> It would be good to have ITK4 in 'experimental'. Having coexisting
>> packages is nice to have but will cause probably too much trouble
>> (especially if we build all the language wrappers again)
> Since it's released, I was planning to upload straight to 'unstable'.
> Do you think there's a need to stage in 'experimental' first?
I think it is better to have ITK4 in experimental for one or two
weeks. This is just to be on the safe side, there are sometimes
unexpected problems with including cmake configuration files.